Why to consider the Separate Court for Criminal Appeals

On Behalf of | Dec 20, 2021 | Criminal Law |

Oklahoma and Texas are the only two states with their own separate high courts, which are in place to resolve matters of civil or criminal nature. In Texas, the Court of Criminal Appeals is usually considered a last resort in the realm of criminal cases but has nevertheless been central to keeping Texas courts moving.

A more efficient way to have cases seen

The Separate Court for Criminal Appeals is such an essential component of Texas’s legal system in part because it expedites the legal process for many who are on trial and awaiting their verdict. It’s highly valuable to judges and others working in law in the way it prevents backlogs of criminal cases from piling up, congesting the court.

The Court of Criminal Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court are generally able to work well together. No major issues have arisen due to differences of opinion, and the two agencies have thus far been able to maintain a healthy and mature professional relationship.

Pushing back against critical reviews

For all its advantages, the Separate Court for Criminal Appeals in Texas is not without criticism, be it from legal scholars, attorneys, government officials, or the press. Among the main points taken issue with is the belief that a judge who focuses on either criminal or civil cases is unable to operate under a broad enough legal perspective, making generalist judges more favorable for the situation.

But there are many who continue to staunchly defend the Separate Court. Proponents point to the fact that the number of trial court convictions that have been affirmed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals significantly outweighs the amount that it has reversed throughout its existence.

If you’re living in Texas and dealing with criminal charges, it’s a good idea to look into the Separate Court for Criminal Appeals. It just might be the route to fast-tracking your verdict so you can move on with your life.